User talk:Red Leader: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Add header
m (m2000-5 missiles code)
m (Add header)
Line 6: Line 6:
:Thanks Johan!  I've learnt quite a bit while looking inside wiki pages at the stuff you and other people have written. —[[User:Red_Leader|Red Leader]] ([[User_talk:Red_Leader|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Red_Leader|contribs]]) 18:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks Johan!  I've learnt quite a bit while looking inside wiki pages at the stuff you and other people have written. —[[User:Red_Leader|Red Leader]] ([[User_talk:Red_Leader|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Red_Leader|contribs]]) 18:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 
== AI guided missiles (discussion moved to [[Talk:Scripted_AI_Missiles|Talk:Scripted AI Missiles]]) ==
Hi Red Leader ! I'm glad that you are working on the AI missile. Please, be aware that a lot of work has been done in terms of generalisation in Aircrat/m2000-5/Nasal/missile.nas ...
Hi Red Leader! I'm glad that you are working on the AI missile. Please, be aware that a lot of work has been done in terms of generalisation in Aircrat/m2000-5/Nasal/missile.nas ...
Just before recoding fox2.nas(which is the original source of missile.nas), could you just take a little look :)
Just before recoding fox2.nas(which is the original source of missile.nas), could you just take a little look :)
Anyways there is still a lot to do... :D
Anyways there is still a lot to do :D.


—[[User:5H1N0B1|5H1N0B1]] ([[User_talk:5H1N0B1|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/5H1N0B1|contribs]]) 10:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
—[[User:5H1N0B1|5H1N0B1]] ([[User_talk:5H1N0B1|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/5H1N0B1|contribs]]) 10:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


:: Like I said previously - this is exactly why it makes sense to factor out generic functionality so that we can come up with an aircraft/use-case agnostic module that lives outside any particular aircraft folder. Restructuring your code should not be too difficult, and would invite others to help develop the code. Keeping such code separate makes absolute sense. Just look at the way Gijs' ND code meanwhile evolved - despite originally being aircraft specific: we are now seeing people contributing to it who are not even interested in the 747 or Boeing aircraft. Thus, I would suggest to prioritize refactoring the code accordingly, so that it can live outside the m2000-5 directory. This isn't rocket science, and you don't even need to use OO - but it will make your lives so much easier. And please let's use the article's talk page to coordinate this - obviously, the wiki article is working pretty well - given that RedLeader is now working on this.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 11:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
: Like I said previously - this is exactly why it makes sense to factor out generic functionality so that we can come up with an aircraft/use-case agnostic module that lives outside any particular aircraft folder. Restructuring your code should not be too difficult, and would invite others to help develop the code. Keeping such code separate makes absolute sense. Just look at the way Gijs' ND code meanwhile evolved - despite originally being aircraft specific: we are now seeing people contributing to it who are not even interested in the 747 or Boeing aircraft. Thus, I would suggest to prioritize refactoring the code accordingly, so that it can live outside the m2000-5 directory. This isn't rocket science, and you don't even need to use OO - but it will make your lives so much easier. And please let's use the article's talk page to coordinate this - obviously, the wiki article is working pretty well - given that RedLeader is now working on this.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 11:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Navigation menu