1
edit
OpenStreetMap import: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Questions/problems
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
* Should we remove shared objects that are currently in the database, if they are not present in OSM? | * Should we remove shared objects that are currently in the database, if they are not present in OSM? | ||
*: {{thumbs down}} [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 16:18, 14 September 2012 (EDT): OSM still lacks a lot of data, so we cannot state that something doesn't exist if it isn't included in the OSM data. We can be fairly sure though that something exists (or existed) if it is present in OSM. | *: {{thumbs down}} [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 16:18, 14 September 2012 (EDT): OSM still lacks a lot of data, so we cannot state that something doesn't exist if it isn't included in the OSM data. We can be fairly sure though that something exists (or existed) if it is present in OSM. | ||
*: {{thumbs up}} [[User:Ambush|Ambush]] ([[User talk:Ambush|talk]]) 11:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC) It's right way to get GIS data from one worldwide specialized source with excellent support from a large community. If OSM have not some data existing in real world, it's better to add this data to OSM and get it back instead of support two GIS databases with duplicates. | |||
* In order to prevent us from adding duplicates, a certain radius around the (OSM) object location should be checked for the presence of objects. What would be a good radius? | * In order to prevent us from adding duplicates, a certain radius around the (OSM) object location should be checked for the presence of objects. What would be a good radius? | ||
* In what group should the objects end up? There is an "OSM" group, but there are also specific "WINDPOWER" and "POWER" groups. | * In what group should the objects end up? There is an "OSM" group, but there are also specific "WINDPOWER" and "POWER" groups. | ||