Nasal HLA standalone: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 57: Line 57:
* [https://gitorious.org/fg/simgear/blobs/next/simgear/hla/HLAObjectClass.cxx HLAObjectClass.?xx]
* [https://gitorious.org/fg/simgear/blobs/next/simgear/hla/HLAObjectClass.cxx HLAObjectClass.?xx]
* [https://gitorious.org/fg/simgear/blobs/next/simgear/hla/HLAObjectInstance.cxx HLAObjectInstance.?xx]
* [https://gitorious.org/fg/simgear/blobs/next/simgear/hla/HLAObjectInstance.cxx HLAObjectInstance.?xx]
Demo code at:
* https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/blobs/next/src/Network/HLA/hla.cxx
* https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/blobs/next/utils/fgai/


<syntaxhighlight lang="cpp">
<syntaxhighlight lang="cpp">
</syntaxhighlight>
</syntaxhighlight>


More demo code at: https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/blobs/next/src/Network/HLA/hla.cxx


In the long run, one would need to implement the full interface of the HLAObjectClass, for example as part of the cppbind framework in simgear/nasal/cppbind- that way, cppbind APIs would become accessible through HLA, so that all cppbind APIs could also be used from a standalone interpreter that would not need to run inside the fgfs main loop anymore.
In the long run, one would need to implement the full interface of the HLAObjectClass, for example as part of the cppbind framework in simgear/nasal/cppbind- that way, cppbind APIs would become accessible through HLA, so that all cppbind APIs could also be used from a standalone interpreter that would not need to run inside the fgfs main loop anymore.


<references/>
<references/>

Navigation menu