FlightGear high-level architecture support: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Weather Simulation: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg33349.html
(→‎Weather Simulation: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg33349.html)
Line 138: Line 138:


== Weather Simulation ==
== Weather Simulation ==
We can have a completely independent weather module using the HLA stuff that runs in an own process/thread. So, at that time you might be able to do more sophisticated stuff. May be it will then be possible to do a full cfd for subparts of the scene. That might be a good thing for a glider scene where you might want to have a more detailed fluid behaviour ...
A weather module running in a different process/thread/machine that computes positions for clouds that are consistenly displayed on each attached viewer.  
A weather module running in a different process/thread/machine that computes positions for clouds that are consistenly displayed on each attached viewer.  
That being a module that is exchangable. The simple version just interploates metars like today, but more sphisticated versions might do a local weather  
That being a module that is exchangable. The simple version just interploates metars like today, but more sphisticated versions might do a local weather  
simulation to get good results for thermals in some small area. The same goes for every component you can think of splitting out.  
simulation to get good results for thermals in some small area. The same goes for every component you can think of splitting out.


== AI Traffic ==
== AI Traffic ==

Navigation menu