Radio propagation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* realistic radio reception of VOR stations, making radio navigation more interesting and realistic in hilly/mountainous terrain.
* realistic radio reception of VOR stations, making radio navigation more interesting and realistic in hilly/mountainous terrain.
* realistic range for DME equipment, reception is now very different to VOR signals due to the very high frequency used. You could have full deflection on the NAV display and no DME data until you pass a minor obstruction.
* realistic range for DME equipment, reception is now very different to VOR signals due to the very high frequency used. You could have full deflection on the NAV display and no DME data until you pass a minor obstruction.
* realistic reception of TACAN stations, including mobile stations (AI tankers etc.). Conditions similar to DME.
* mostly realistic radio reception of localizer and glideslope signals, making landings more interesting for certain airports.
* mostly realistic radio reception of localizer and glideslope signals, making landings more interesting for certain airports.
* configuration and realistic reception of radio beacons located anywhere in the 3D world, while presenting calculated signal values according to different official guidelines, including but not limited to the FAA.
* configuration and realistic reception of radio beacons located anywhere in the 3D world, while presenting calculated signal values according to different official guidelines, including but not limited to the FAA.
Line 81: Line 82:
* point-to-point path loss calculations over rough terrain using the ITM library for air traffic control stations to pilot communication. Also AI to pilot reception.
* point-to-point path loss calculations over rough terrain using the ITM library for air traffic control stations to pilot communication. Also AI to pilot reception.
* point-to-point path loss calculations using the ITM library for VOR/Localizer and Glideslope stations <ref>http://www2.rohde-schwarz.com/file_15494/1MA193_0e.pdf</ref>.
* point-to-point path loss calculations using the ITM library for VOR/Localizer and Glideslope stations <ref>http://www2.rohde-schwarz.com/file_15494/1MA193_0e.pdf</ref>.
* point-to-point path loss calculations using the ITM library for DME stations. Still WIP because of some issues with different altitudes in nav.dat
* point-to-point path loss calculations using the ITM library for DME stations <ref>http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim/aim0101.html</ref>. Can be affected by some issues with stations sunk in the ground (request test info).
* point-to-point path loss calculations using the ITM library for TACAN stations, including mobile stations (AI tankers etc.) <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system</ref>. Can be affected by some issues with stations sunk in the ground (request test info).
* for VHF/UHF stations beyond a reasonable terrain loading distance, automatic transition to path loss calculation over a smooth round earth using alternative free space signal attenuation equations
* for VHF/UHF stations beyond a reasonable terrain loading distance, automatic transition to path loss calculation over a smooth round earth using alternative free space signal attenuation equations
* RF link budget calculations using transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, antenna gain and height above terrain, taking into account typical values from various specifications
* RF link budget calculations using transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, antenna gain and height above terrain, taking into account typical values from various specifications
Line 97: Line 99:
====Features which still need to be implemented====
====Features which still need to be implemented====


* <strike>separate DME from VOR reception, since it uses a completly different range of frequencies: in reality, when VOR-DME directional signal is received, it is possible that DME information is not available, due to terrain/weather or ground clutter influence</strike>. <ref>http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim/aim0101.html</ref> Works without clutter, but what about stations sunk into the ground? Possible bug affecting this.
* Figure out what to do about VOR/DME/TAC stations sunk into the ground? Possible bug affecting them, maybe only on custom terrain.
* reception of ACARS ground messages via VHF radios
* reception of ACARS ground messages via VHF radios
* usage of weather simulation and atmospheric conditions which affect radio propagation: tropospheric ducting, cloud backscatter etc.
* usage of weather simulation and atmospheric conditions which affect radio propagation: tropospheric ducting, cloud backscatter etc.
223

edits

Navigation menu