Stand Alone ATC Control Development: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by Martin.spott (talk) to last revision by Hooray
m (Remove misleading comment)
m (Reverted edits by Martin.spott (talk) to last revision by Hooray)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Affected by Canvas|Canvas Maps}}
Last updated: Dec. 2010
Last updated: Dec. 2010


Line 9: Line 11:


= Positioning =
= Positioning =
Today there are 4 types of ATC-applications known, to which we may try to position the new development:
Today there are 3 types of ATC-applications known, to which we may try to position the new development:


== Todays Real Life ATC ==
== Todays Real Life ATC ==
Line 48: Line 50:
* '''needs "low skill borders" to achieve increased acceptability  
* '''needs "low skill borders" to achieve increased acceptability  
'''
'''
== [[OpenRadar]] ==
* provides a stand-alone GUI application, not 3rd party dependencies
* written in Java
* has abstraction to plug different frontends for being used with different/future data feeds and -formats


== Proposed Positioning for FGFS-ATC ==
== Proposed Positioning for FGFS-ATC ==
Line 270: Line 268:


= Related =
= Related =
== Wiki ==
* [[OpenRadar]]
== Talks ==
== Talks ==
* http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1416662&group_id=9456&atid=359456
* http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1416662&group_id=9456&atid=359456

Navigation menu