Talk:Property Tree Intro: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
comments WRT moving Property Intro to Property Tree page
m (comments WRT moving Property Intro to Property Tree page)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
::EDIT: I think I do understand you now. I've added a little template to the right side of the pages, pleset take a look and let me know if that is what you meant. However, I still think that the intro should be placed on the [[Property Tree]] page, as that's the first page everyone will see...
::EDIT: I think I do understand you now. I've added a little template to the right side of the pages, pleset take a look and let me know if that is what you meant. However, I still think that the intro should be placed on the [[Property Tree]] page, as that's the first page everyone will see...
::[[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 04:11, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
::[[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 04:11, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
::: Agreed, but it is just somewhat unfortunate that the current [[Property Tree]] article is mostly just a collection of various properties instead of really an introduction to the property tree (and the underlying concepts) itself. This was already a problem back when I put together the current intro, so please do feel free to re-arrange the corresponding contents, preferably there would be at least three different types of articles: 1) property tree introduction, 2) property usage scenarios/examples 3) most important properties (for programmers/contributors, as some sort of 'reference').  Also, it's probably worth mentioning that the current Intro article is certainly far from complete or comprehensive in the first place. --[[User:MILSTD|MILSTD]] 08:06, 8 September 2009 (EDT)


That is wicked.. exactly what one had in mind but better. Thanks Gijs
That is wicked.. exactly what one had in mind but better. Thanks Gijs
[[User:Ac001|ac001]] 04:32, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
[[User:Ac001|ac001]] 04:32, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
2,561

edits

Navigation menu