20,741
edits
High-Level Architecture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Current Status: https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37726603/
No edit summary |
m (→Current Status: https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37726603/) |
||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
==Current Status == | ==Current Status == | ||
Last updated: ( | Last updated: (10/2022) | ||
Stuart did some prototyping work to federate FlightGear within HLA a number of years ago, using OpenRTI and SimKit. There should be some reference in the | |||
mailing list archive if you care to look. It is certainly possible, and one use case was to decouple the IG (image generator) and enable work to start using VSG (vulcan scene graph) while continuing to support OSG. | |||
FlightGear is used regularly as a decoupled Image Generator for both academic and industry projects, through the many flexible I/O options available. They just aren't publicised much. | |||
There has been some work on how we might move to VulkanSceneGraph, but last I heard there were some technical problems we couldn't overcome. <ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37726603/</ref> | |||
Stuart is cautiously optimistic that he may be able to provide the start of a HLA implementation quite soon, as one of the blocking factors may be resolved soon.<ref>{{cite web | Stuart is cautiously optimistic that he may be able to provide the start of a HLA implementation quite soon, as one of the blocking factors may be resolved soon.<ref>{{cite web | ||