PUI: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
603 bytes removed ,  6 September 2022
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


We are to some extent hamstrung by the rather old GUI toolkit we use. However, replacing that is going to be non-trivial, and it would affect not just the core GUI but also all the dialog boxes that have been set up for particular aircraft.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25985.html</ref>
We are to some extent hamstrung by the rather old GUI toolkit we use. However, replacing that is going to be non-trivial, and it would affect not just the core GUI but also all the dialog boxes that have been set up for particular aircraft.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25985.html</ref>
If you know something about GUI systems, something about portability of code across all our supported platforms, and something about FlightGear.  Then post a proposal for a change.  Better yet, post patches with a new GUI system that doesn't suck, runs efficiently, supports all platforms, integrates cleanly with FlightGear, doesn't add a nightmare of new library dependencies, isn't chock full of bugs, does everything the current system does, and does everything you think a GUI system should do, etc. etc.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25995.html</ref>


[[File:menubar2.jpg|517px]]
[[File:menubar2.jpg|517px]]

Navigation menu