20,741
edits
(→Status) |
|||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
So we've always got the basic scenario to fall back on where there is just a single view and things are essentially identical to a standard non-CompositeViewer setup.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37076818/</ref> | So we've always got the basic scenario to fall back on where there is just a single view and things are essentially identical to a standard non-CompositeViewer setup.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37076818/</ref> | ||
<!-- | |||
=== OSG stuff === | === OSG stuff === | ||
{{Note|As a general note, osgViewer::CompositeViewer should have osgViewer::View attached to it NOT osgViewer::Viewer. It's a composite of View's not composite of Viewer. If you look at all the OSG example they illustrate the correct usage.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org/msg70462.html</ref>}} | {{Note|As a general note, osgViewer::CompositeViewer should have osgViewer::View attached to it NOT osgViewer::Viewer. It's a composite of View's not composite of Viewer. If you look at all the OSG example they illustrate the correct usage.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org/msg70462.html</ref>}} | ||
Line 224: | Line 225: | ||
onscreen one would give you means to visually QA things as you go | onscreen one would give you means to visually QA things as you go | ||
along.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org/msg70703.html</ref> | along.<ref>https://www.mail-archive.com/osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org/msg70703.html</ref> | ||
--> | |||
== Use Cases == | == Use Cases == |