20,741
edits
Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
== Implementation Strategy == | == Implementation Strategy == | ||
{{See also|IPC}} | |||
Coming up with some kind of unifying platform: A modern launcher UI (maybe even as a webapp) which can launch FlightGear, configure certain stuff (during FG running) and arrange communications with third-party processes implemented in Python or other languages. These would then manage scenarios, AI, maybe even input devices and aircraft systems. Of course, this would need a better integration of remote protocols into FG. The user wouldn't notice anything of the hidden processes, because the launcher/manager takes care of everything, even the spawning and killing of the auxiliary processes.<ref>{{cite web | Coming up with some kind of unifying platform: A modern launcher UI (maybe even as a webapp) which can launch FlightGear, configure certain stuff (during FG running) and arrange communications with third-party processes implemented in Python or other languages. These would then manage scenarios, AI, maybe even input devices and aircraft systems. Of course, this would need a better integration of remote protocols into FG. The user wouldn't notice anything of the hidden processes, because the launcher/manager takes care of everything, even the spawning and killing of the auxiliary processes.<ref>{{cite web | ||
|url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148 | |url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148 |