20,741
edits
Modernizing FlightGear Scripting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Modernizing FlightGear Scripting (view source)
Revision as of 12:57, 8 October 2016
, 8 October 2016→Background
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|date = Feb 27th, 2009 | |date = Feb 27th, 2009 | ||
|added = Feb 27th, 2009 | |added = Feb 27th, 2009 | ||
|script_version = 0.40 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
There's really nothing (other than cosmetics) wrong with Lua. As you mention, it's grown into a large community with lots of documentation and libraries and professional-looking trappings. None of that was true in 2003/4 when Nasal was in its infancy, but it is now, and I can see why it would be attractive. If you want to do the integration work and maintain it (remember, there's a ton of code outside the interpreter you need to write to be able to do useful things inside the simulator), feel free.<ref>{{cite web | |||
|url = https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/21831646/ | |||
|title = <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nasal alternatives : possible, of course, </nowiki> | |||
|author = <nowiki> Andy Ross </nowiki> | |||
|date = Mar 14th, 2009 | |||
|added = Mar 14th, 2009 | |||
|script_version = 0.40 | |script_version = 0.40 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||