20,741
edits
Modernizing FlightGear Scripting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Modernizing FlightGear Scripting (view source)
Revision as of 12:55, 8 October 2016
, 8 October 2016→Background
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
but trivial or hair pulling task ? </nowiki> | but trivial or hair pulling task ? </nowiki> | ||
|author = <nowiki> Melchior FRANZ </nowiki> | |author = <nowiki> Melchior FRANZ </nowiki> | ||
|date = Feb 27th, 2009 | |||
|added = Feb 27th, 2009 | |||
|script_version = 0.40 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
Nasal is *very* well designed, compact, and efficient. It is used heavily throughout many areas of FlightGear. So most core developers can't imagine any scenario where we would switch to some new scripting language unless a lot key developers were convinced that it was every so much better that that benefit would substantially outweigh the cost. And that scenario is hard to imagine.<ref>{{cite web | |||
|url = https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/21694135/ | |||
|title = <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nasal alternatives : possible, of course, | |||
but trivial or hair pulling task ? </nowiki> | |||
|author = <nowiki> Curtis Olson </nowiki> | |||
|date = Feb 27th, 2009 | |date = Feb 27th, 2009 | ||
|added = Feb 27th, 2009 | |added = Feb 27th, 2009 | ||