20,741
edits
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|script_version = 0.40 | |script_version = 0.40 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
let's keep in mind that despite the current situation with Nasal, many core developers are already concerned that scripting is being used too widely - regardless of Nasal being de-facto under-documented, and hardly maintained - this situation would only get worse once/if a real mainstream language is supported. | let's keep in mind that despite the current situation with Nasal, many core developers are already concerned that scripting is being used too widely - regardless of Nasal being de-facto under-documented, and hardly maintained - this situation would only get worse once/if a real mainstream language is supported. | ||
In summary, it's not like Nasal's syntax is esoteric in any way - it is far more standard than Fortran, Forth, LISP or Scheme - despite those being definitely "more mainstream" than Nasal - and it being close enough to C, C++ and GLSL, also means that people doing FlightGear scripting get a feeling for the syntax that will come in handy later, when looking at other, non-nasal, FlightGear source code.|url | In summary, it's not like Nasal's syntax is esoteric in any way - it is far more standard than Fortran, Forth, LISP or Scheme - despite those being definitely "more mainstream" than Nasal - and it being close enough to C, C++ and GLSL, also means that people doing FlightGear scripting get a feeling for the syntax that will come in handy later, when looking at other, non-nasal, FlightGear source code. <ref>{{cite web|url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296259#p296259 | ||
|title = <nowiki> Re: Nasal must go </nowiki> | |title = <nowiki> Re: Nasal must go </nowiki> | ||
|author = <nowiki> Hooray </nowiki> | |author = <nowiki> Hooray </nowiki> | ||
|date = Oct 8th, 2016 | |date = Oct 8th, 2016 | ||
|added = Oct 8th, 2016 | |added = Oct 8th, 2016 | ||
|script_version = 0.40 | |script_version = 0.40 }}</ref> | ||