Modernizing FlightGear Scripting: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:


== Challenges ==
== Challenges ==
The paradigm of binding a C/C++ core to a scripting language has its own disadvantages, and that makes it very difficult to switch.<ref>{{cite web
  |url    =  https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296201#p296201
  |title  =  <nowiki> Re: Nasal must go </nowiki>
  |author =  <nowiki> Beaver </nowiki>
  |date  =  Oct 7th, 2016
  |added  =  Oct 7th, 2016
  |script_version = 0.40
  }}</ref>
FlightGear can't just ditch Nasal. Bringing another scripting language into the fold would certainly be a big undertaking.<ref>{{cite web
FlightGear can't just ditch Nasal. Bringing another scripting language into the fold would certainly be a big undertaking.<ref>{{cite web
   |url    =  https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148  
   |url    =  https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148  

Navigation menu