20,741
edits
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Challenges == | == Challenges == | ||
The paradigm of binding a C/C++ core to a scripting language has its own disadvantages, and that makes it very difficult to switch.<ref>{{cite web | |||
|url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296201#p296201 | |||
|title = <nowiki> Re: Nasal must go </nowiki> | |||
|author = <nowiki> Beaver </nowiki> | |||
|date = Oct 7th, 2016 | |||
|added = Oct 7th, 2016 | |||
|script_version = 0.40 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
FlightGear can't just ditch Nasal. Bringing another scripting language into the fold would certainly be a big undertaking.<ref>{{cite web | FlightGear can't just ditch Nasal. Bringing another scripting language into the fold would certainly be a big undertaking.<ref>{{cite web | ||
|url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148 | |url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296148#p296148 |