FGPythonSys: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,109 bytes added ,  8 October 2016
Line 354: Line 354:


== Status ==
== Status ==
the focus of the efforts in my experimental [https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=28378&p=289080&hilit=python#p289080 FGPythonSys branches] is more to provide a Python interface to core FlightGear programming rather than replace Nasal.  For example one aim is to convert the whole of the SimGear programming interface (API) into a Python library.  Another is to expose the subsystem interface to allow for Python modules to create new FlightGear subsystems.  As a biarre aside, if FGPythonSys was designed to replace Nasal, it would also be able to fully replace the XML parts of aircraft as well.
In any case, I have been a bit busy with RL and there is no one helping in the task of advancing FGPythonSys.  So at this rate, replacing Nasal with Python will only be a pipe dream for a few content developers.<ref>{{cite web
  |url    =  https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=296170#p296170
  |title  =  <nowiki> Re: Nasal must go </nowiki>
  |author =  <nowiki> bugman </nowiki>
  |date  =  Oct 6th, 2016
  |added  =  Oct 6th, 2016
  |script_version = 0.40
  }}</ref>
{{FGCquote
{{FGCquote
|1= I'm also battling with VS 2015 (msvc14) on a VirtualBox VM with Windows 7.  I need to have this system up and running, because Windows support for FGPythonSys is essential.
|1= I'm also battling with VS 2015 (msvc14) on a VirtualBox VM with Windows 7.  I need to have this system up and running, because Windows support for FGPythonSys is essential.

Navigation menu