116
edits
Stand Alone ATC Control Development: Difference between revisions
Stand Alone ATC Control Development (view source)
Revision as of 21:17, 8 October 2012
, 8 October 2012Comment on OpenRadar
m (Reverted edits by Martin.spott (talk) to last revision by Hooray) |
Martin.spott (talk | contribs) (Comment on OpenRadar) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
= Positioning = | = Positioning = | ||
Today there are | Today there are 4 types of ATC-applications known, to which we may try to position the new development: | ||
== Todays Real Life ATC == | == Todays Real Life ATC == | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* '''needs "low skill borders" to achieve increased acceptability | * '''needs "low skill borders" to achieve increased acceptability | ||
''' | ''' | ||
== [[OpenRadar]] == | |||
* provides a stand-alone GUI application, not 3rd party dependencies | |||
* written in Java | |||
* has abstraction to plug different frontends for being used with different/future data feeds and -formats | |||
== Proposed Positioning for FGFS-ATC == | == Proposed Positioning for FGFS-ATC == | ||
| Line 268: | Line 272: | ||
= Related = | = Related = | ||
== Talks == | == Talks == | ||
* http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1416662&group_id=9456&atid=359456 | * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1416662&group_id=9456&atid=359456 | ||