20,741
edits
Release plan: Difference between revisions
→2.10
(→2.10: http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=19006%20#p176549) |
(→2.10) |
||
| Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
** the "FlightGear & friends" SuseStudio images should probably be also updated for each release cycle [http://susestudio.com/a/sBTdmU/flightgear-friends--2] | ** the "FlightGear & friends" SuseStudio images should probably be also updated for each release cycle [http://susestudio.com/a/sBTdmU/flightgear-friends--2] | ||
** every now and then, people raise the issue of the major/minor version numbering scheme being a little confusing to people not familiar with software development, thinking that 2.8 must be newer/better/more recent than 2.11 - using code names or release dates instead was suggested [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=19255] | ** every now and then, people raise the issue of the major/minor version numbering scheme being a little confusing to people not familiar with software development, thinking that 2.8 must be newer/better/more recent than 2.11 - using code names or release dates instead was suggested [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=19255] | ||
** there are usually reviews posted on blogs, forums etc after each release - we should specifically collect links to those and evaluate all opinions [http://forum.avsim.net/topic/400897-my-experience-with-flightgear-210/] [http://forum.avsim.net/topic/399809-fg-210-most-certainly-a-new-era-of-fg/] | |||
* '''Better bug reports and troubleshooting''': | * '''Better bug reports and troubleshooting''': | ||