User talk:RevHardt: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Link updated.)
Line 10: Line 10:
:: #1 [http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1463693/nasal.xml Download here]
:: #1 [http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1463693/nasal.xml Download here]
:: #2 [http://superuser.com/questions/62474/notepad-custom-syntax-highlighting-setting-where-to-look-for-it Instructions are here]
:: #2 [http://superuser.com/questions/62474/notepad-custom-syntax-highlighting-setting-where-to-look-for-it Instructions are here]
:: #3 [http://gitorious.org/nasal-npp-support/nasal-npp Gitorious repository]
:: #3 [http://gitorious.org/nasal-support/nasal-npp Gitorious repository]


:: #1 and #2 are previously submitted entries from another user, which are barebones, and would conflict with what I have come up with (#3) if installed side by side.
:: #1 and #2 are previously submitted entries from another user, which are barebones, and would conflict with what I have come up with (#3) if installed side by side.

Revision as of 09:16, 26 July 2014

Layout fixes

While I understand your frustration with alignment of elements in the articles, using <br /> tags is a bit misguided. It will in practice only work for your screen resolution, font size etc. Another way to do the same thing, but working with different browser resolutions and settings, is to use the {{-}} template. I did that for you (with some copy editing) in this edit.

Last but not least: Thank you for your contributions anyway. Notepad++ is quite popular, so the syntax highlighting will most probably be used.

Johan G (Talk | contribs) 19:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Pretty much a noob at wiki markup, so thanks for the copy editing.
#1 Download here
#2 Instructions are here
#3 Gitorious repository
#1 and #2 are previously submitted entries from another user, which are barebones, and would conflict with what I have come up with (#3) if installed side by side.
Of course, I let those remain out of respect but they should be clearly separated as an alternative to #3.
I have made a corresponding edit to that effect. Please review to see if it fits the styling code. Thanks a lot.
RevHardt (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)