User talk:Chris blues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chris blues (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Hiding table of contents: cmt) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Hiding table of contents=== | |||
Hi Chris... | Hi Chris... | ||
According to the question about the ''index-table'' on [[FGo!]]: if you mean the ''table of contents''? It can easily removed by adding "<tt><nowiki>__NOTOC__</nowiki></tt>" (2x"_") at the top of the article. Hope it helps, --[[User:LarsP|LarsP]] 12:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | According to the question about the ''index-table'' on [[FGo!]]: if you mean the ''table of contents''? It can easily removed by adding "<tt><nowiki>__NOTOC__</nowiki></tt>" (2x"_") at the top of the article. Hope it helps, --[[User:LarsP|LarsP]] 12:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Hi LarsP! | : Hi LarsP! | ||
Thx a lot! [[User:Chris blues|Chris blues]] 15:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | : Thx a lot! [[User:Chris blues|Chris blues]] 15:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: Hi guys, | |||
:: At the time it wasn't neccesary to add the NOTOC command, as the wiki auto-hides TOCs for articles with less than four subheadings. Anyway, I've added the infobox, some wiki links and a related content "list" (so now the NOTOC command is neccesary to hide the TOC). | |||
:: Cheers and thanks for your additions to the wiki! | |||
:: [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 16:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
::: Hi! That's the point. There's a time when no command is needed. But then the article expands (as a wiki article should naturally do) and then it's suddenly needesd. Who takes care of this? Therefore I prefer adding such a command right from the beginning... --[[User:LarsP|LarsP]] 13:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Gijs is incorrect. When I added the NOTOC, I removed a section that was unneeded at the time (which I expected to be re-added as content was added). This resulted in 3 sections. Thus, if I had not edited the article, there would have been 4 sections, resulting in a table of contents. I find TOCs to be helpful on long articles, but on short ones, such as FGo, they take up space. [[User:Flightmonster|The]][[User talk:Flightmonster#top|Flight]][[Special:Contributions/Flightmonster|Monster]] 13:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:17, 19 October 2010
Hiding table of contents
Hi Chris...
According to the question about the index-table on FGo!: if you mean the table of contents? It can easily removed by adding "__NOTOC__" (2x"_") at the top of the article. Hope it helps, --LarsP 12:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi LarsP!
- Thx a lot! Chris blues 15:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi guys,
- At the time it wasn't neccesary to add the NOTOC command, as the wiki auto-hides TOCs for articles with less than four subheadings. Anyway, I've added the infobox, some wiki links and a related content "list" (so now the NOTOC command is neccesary to hide the TOC).
- Cheers and thanks for your additions to the wiki!
- Gijs 16:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! That's the point. There's a time when no command is needed. But then the article expands (as a wiki article should naturally do) and then it's suddenly needesd. Who takes care of this? Therefore I prefer adding such a command right from the beginning... --LarsP 13:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Gijs is incorrect. When I added the NOTOC, I removed a section that was unneeded at the time (which I expected to be re-added as content was added). This resulted in 3 sections. Thus, if I had not edited the article, there would have been 4 sections, resulting in a table of contents. I find TOCs to be helpful on long articles, but on short ones, such as FGo, they take up space. TheFlightMonster 13:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)