User talk:Bugman: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Indentation)
(→‎The collapsible script template: Moved the newsletter template discussion to http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=FlightGear_wiki:Village_pump&oldid=88787#Newsletter_templates)
Line 16: Line 16:
: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 12:51, 19 October 2015 (EDT)
: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 12:51, 19 October 2015 (EDT)


:: maybe, we could come up with something similar to this to help clean up the newsletter template ? At some point, core developers were also contemplating to use newsletter contents as templates for some kind of FSWeekend/LinuxTag handout - I guess, a few templates could be used to mark relevant additions in each newsletter and automatically "nominate" those for inclusion in some kind of FSWeekend/LinuxTag handout? The same thing could then also be used for helping come up with a semi-automated ChangeLog/Release announcement, too.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 06:52, 20 October 2015 (EDT)


::: This sounds like two solutions:
: ''The newsletter template discussion was moved to [[FlightGear wiki:Village pump#Newsletter templates]] ([http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=FlightGear_wiki:Village_pump&oldid=88787#Newsletter_templates perm]).''
 
::: For re-usability, maybe each part of the newsletter can be placed into its own article such as [[FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect]], [[FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas]].  Then this can be transcluded into the newsletter, as well as into a document for ultimately creating the handout.  So this would be a fragmentation approach.  Here is an external example where I have used this to reuse documentation, and where it is transcluded into a template, itself to be used for transclusion:  [http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/Template:MessageBox/doc Template:MessageBox/doc].
 
::: The second would be to turn the entire newsletter itself into a template.  Then people could just add values to parameters. Here is a little mock up:
 
<pre>{{newsletter
| stage    = draft
| date    = October 2015
| date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
| title1  = ALS dirt runway effect
| section1 = devel
| text1    =
The Atmospheric Light Scattering framework...
| title2  = PUI2Canvas: parsing PUI/XML using Nasal and Canvas
| section2 = devel
| text2    =
<gallery widths=350>
Scenarios-via-pui2canvas.xml.png...
}}
</pre>
 
::: Then the newsletter can be constructed entirely using #if #switch and #tag magic words.  Or if combining with the fragmentation approach, the result is even more compact:
<pre>{{newsletter
| stage    = draft
| date    = October 2015
| date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
| section1 = devel
| text1    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect}}
| section2 = devel
| text2    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas}}
}}
</pre>
 
::: The only issue is that the result is that old newsletter might change or break as the template is updated (using a version numbering system in the template name itself would solve this).  I also suggest that you (Hooray) shift these last two comments somewhere more public, leaving links to the new location.
 
::: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 09:35, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
 
:::: yes, that sounds good-we may want to provide some filtering options, i.e. for including/excluding certain contents, such as screen shots/youtube videos (which are typically not used on the website)-equally, youtube videos would not be relevant for creating a handout. That would also allow us to exclude certain "stubs" or standard paragraphs of the newsletter, i.e. "call for help", "translations wanted" etc. And we could also have a handful of broad categories (core development, aircraft, scenery etc) to serve as "channels", which would also allow us to transclude contents spanning more than a single newsletter cycle, or even spanning multiple release cycles (e.g. to create a time-line procedurally). But I guess some additional addons may be helpful to simplify creation/addition of contents, i.e. Johan once mentioned a JavaScript-solution for creating semi-dynamic forms to help with the creation of template-based articles (cannot find it atm). Right, I guess this should be moved to the village pump/wiki namespace - but we once did have a similar discussion already (also cannot find that one).--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 11:24, 20 October 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:40, 21 October 2015

The collapsible script template

Noticed the {{collapsible script}} template. That will probably come in handy in many places.

I had no idea that there was such a thing as {{#tag: }}. That may be useful later when I have played around with it.

Hmm, I see the template defaults to Dec Vadic's Imperial Arem Star. lol ;-)

Johan G (Talk | contribs) 18:12, 16 October 2015 (EDT)

There are quite a few places in the wiki cluttered up by long scripts or code segments. I guess it is mainly Nasal, though some other parts could benefit from other templates using collapsible NavFrame elements. The {{#tag: }} concept is quite useful for programmatically adding tags in templates, avoiding the initial HTML parsing, but it isn't perfect. Anyway, I can see it spreading on the wiki already :) As for the template default, I hope no one is curious and tries it out!
Bugman (talk) 10:14, 18 October 2015 (EDT)
Let me add that {{#tag: }} allows for transclusion within any HTML tag, which is normally not possible.
Bugman (talk) 12:51, 19 October 2015 (EDT)


The newsletter template discussion was moved to FlightGear wiki:Village pump#Newsletter templates (perm).