User talk:Bugman: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎The collapsible script template: Fix for the {{newsletter}} template mock up.)
Line 46: Line 46:
  | date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
  | date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
  | section1 = devel
  | section1 = devel
  | text1    = {{FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect}}
  | text1    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect}}
  | section2 = devel
  | section2 = devel
  | text2    = {{FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas}}
  | text2    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas}}
}}
}}
  </pre>
  </pre>

Revision as of 14:58, 20 October 2015

The collapsible script template

Noticed the {{collapsible script}} template. That will probably come in handy in many places.

I had no idea that there was such a thing as {{#tag: }}. That may be useful later when I have played around with it.

Hmm, I see the template defaults to Dec Vadic's Imperial Arem Star. lol ;-)

Johan G (Talk | contribs) 18:12, 16 October 2015 (EDT)

There are quite a few places in the wiki cluttered up by long scripts or code segments. I guess it is mainly Nasal, though some other parts could benefit from other templates using collapsible NavFrame elements. The {{#tag: }} concept is quite useful for programmatically adding tags in templates, avoiding the initial HTML parsing, but it isn't perfect. Anyway, I can see it spreading on the wiki already :) As for the template default, I hope no one is curious and tries it out!
Bugman (talk) 10:14, 18 October 2015 (EDT)
Let me add that {{#tag: }} allows for transclusion within any HTML tag, which is normally not possible.
Bugman (talk) 12:51, 19 October 2015 (EDT)
maybe, we could come up with something similar to this to help clean up the newsletter template ? At some point, core developers were also contemplating to use newsletter contents as templates for some kind of FSWeekend/LinuxTag handout - I guess, a few templates could be used to mark relevant additions in each newsletter and automatically "nominate" those for inclusion in some kind of FSWeekend/LinuxTag handout? The same thing could then also be used for helping come up with a semi-automated ChangeLog/Release announcement, too.--Hooray (talk) 06:52, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
This sounds like two solutions:
For re-usability, maybe each part of the newsletter can be placed into its own article such as FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect, FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas. Then this can be transcluded into the newsletter, as well as into a document for ultimately creating the handout. So this would be a fragmentation approach. Here is an external example where I have used this to reuse documentation, and where it is transcluded into a template, itself to be used for transclusion: Template:MessageBox/doc.
The second would be to turn the entire newsletter itself into a template. Then people could just add values to parameters. Here is a little mock up:
{{newsletter
 | stage    = draft
 | date     = October 2015
 | date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
 | title1   = ALS dirt runway effect
 | section1 = devel
 | text1    =
 The Atmospheric Light Scattering framework...
 | title2   = PUI2Canvas: parsing PUI/XML using Nasal and Canvas
 | section2 = devel
 | text2    =
 <gallery widths=350>
 Scenarios-via-pui2canvas.xml.png...
}}
 
Then the newsletter can be constructed entirely using #if #switch and #tag magic words. Or if combining with the fragmentation approach, the result is even more compact:
{{newsletter
 | stage    = draft
 | date     = October 2015
 | date2    = 2015 10    <!-- for the newsletter category -->
 | section1 = devel
 | text1    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc ALS dirt runway effect}}
 | section2 = devel
 | text2    = {{:FlightGear_Newsletter_October_2015/doc PUI2Canvas}}
}}
 
The only issue is that the result is that old newsletter might change or break as the template is updated (using a version numbering system in the template name itself would solve this). I also suggest that you (Hooray) shift these last two comments somewhere more public, leaving links to the new location.
Bugman (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2015 (EDT)