Template talk:Infobox aircraft: Difference between revisions
Hellosimon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Suggestion: Field for aircraft's name in FlightGear in the Info box.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The extension is installed - see [[Special:Version]], but the installation page for the extension reports that #if is broken with 1.6.x. [[User:Hellosimon|Hellosimon]] 11:44, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | The extension is installed - see [[Special:Version]], but the installation page for the extension reports that #if is broken with 1.6.x. [[User:Hellosimon|Hellosimon]] 11:44, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
== Suggestion: Field for aircraft's name in FlightGear in the Info box. == | |||
I think it would be good to have a field in the info box for the aircraft's name(s) in FlightGear (i.e. the ones used with --aircraft=<name>). These are not seldom short and a bit cryptic, hence (IMHO) not suitable as the displayed main name of the aircraft or as the page name. Nice work with the new info box template, btw! --[[User:AndersG|AndersG]] 18:29, 24 October 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:29, 24 October 2007
It would give more control over the infobox if we had the parser installed. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ParserFunctions#.23if: --Sek
I agree. By the way, we seem to have lost our abilities to upload files. Can we get that back? -Ampere 00:28, 12 June 2006 (EDT)
Uploads should be working again - not sure how I missed that. The parser extension is also now installed. Hellosimon 01:17, 12 June 2006 (EDT)
The parser functions don't seem to work. Can anyone confirm? -70.48.6.31 21:59, 12 June 2006 (EDT)
The parser functions still aren't working. For example: gives me this instead:
See the template.
-Ampere 15:43, 17 June 2006 (EDT)
The extension is installed - see Special:Version, but the installation page for the extension reports that #if is broken with 1.6.x. Hellosimon 11:44, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
Suggestion: Field for aircraft's name in FlightGear in the Info box.
I think it would be good to have a field in the info box for the aircraft's name(s) in FlightGear (i.e. the ones used with --aircraft=<name>). These are not seldom short and a bit cryptic, hence (IMHO) not suitable as the displayed main name of the aircraft or as the page name. Nice work with the new info box template, btw! --AndersG 18:29, 24 October 2007 (EDT)