Template talk:Git link: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Place to test: {{Git file|gitorious|fg/flightgear|next|src/Main/options.cxx}}")
 
(→‎gitorious: I saw the notice at Gitorious. Read leader have been working on Template:Repo link to replace the older ones.)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Place to test:
== gitorious  ==
* http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=25547&p=233946
* http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33530823/


{{Git file|gitorious|fg/flightgear|next|src/Main/options.cxx}}
may need to further generalize/update the template to prepare it for "the future" (with or without gitorious ...)
 
besides, it would make sense to directly support the /commits view for branches, as that is much more representative than just showing a directory tree, thoughts ?
 
--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 12:47, 4 March 2015 (EST)
 
: Yeah, question is how.  I saw the Gitorious.org site notice and the [https://about.gitlab.com/2015/03/03/gitlab-acquires-gitorious/ Git.Lab blog post] just a couple of ours ago.  I did not expect Gitorious.org to disappear.  That is a lot of links to handle, one way or another.  It could quite possible be enough to modify the template. (Also makes me wonder what has been going on on the forum the last few days. I have yet to drop in there.)
 
: {{usr|Red Leader}} have been working on replacing the separate repository link templates with {{tl|repo link}}.  I guess that at some point the older templates will redirect to that link.
 
: —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 20:27, 5 March 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 01:27, 6 March 2015

gitorious

may need to further generalize/update the template to prepare it for "the future" (with or without gitorious ...)

besides, it would make sense to directly support the /commits view for branches, as that is much more representative than just showing a directory tree, thoughts ?

--Hooray (talk) 12:47, 4 March 2015 (EST)

Yeah, question is how. I saw the Gitorious.org site notice and the Git.Lab blog post just a couple of ours ago. I did not expect Gitorious.org to disappear. That is a lot of links to handle, one way or another. It could quite possible be enough to modify the template. (Also makes me wonder what has been going on on the forum the last few days. I have yet to drop in there.)
Red Leader have been working on replacing the separate repository link templates with {{repo link}}. I guess that at some point the older templates will redirect to that link.
Johan G (Talk | contribs) 20:27, 5 March 2015 (EST)