Template talk:GitStatus: Difference between revisions
(→Updating and improving the status template(s): There is some room for improvement. Which improvements would You like to see?) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
—[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 22:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC) | —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 22:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
: See [[FlightGear wiki:Village pump/Archive 2013#Automating Template:Git status]] | |||
: [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] ([[User talk:Gijs|talk]]) 12:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:57, 18 December 2014
Updating and improving the status template(s)
{{GitStatus}}, {{GitStatus:closed}}, {{GitStatus:frozen}} and {{GitStatus:open}}
As they are largely undocumented, do not use parameters and some data, like the next release and the dates is repeated many times and have to be edited in many places, maintenance is a hassle. In essence they could be more automated and better documented so that maintaining them would be more straight forward.
Some things I could see useful is having the current and next releases as separate templates (they could be useful in other places as well) and having to edit the dates only in special circumstances and doing that through parameters in those cases. Also, why four separate templates?
Are there other functionality you guys always have wanted but have not figured out or taken time to add?
—Johan G (Talk | contribs) 22:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- See FlightGear wiki:Village pump/Archive 2013#Automating Template:Git status
- Gijs (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)