Talk:Laptops known to run FlightGear: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added links to results page) |
Quadunit404 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Probably other people with X3100 chipset could post their findings to compare. | Probably other people with X3100 chipset could post their findings to compare. | ||
[[User:Leman|Leman]] 05:33, 28 July 2008 (EDT) | [[User:Leman|Leman]] 05:33, 28 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Acer Aspire 4530-6823 == | |||
I got FlightGear 2.0.0 running on my Acer Aspire 4530-6823 notebook. The average FPS was 15, with both shaders on and off (at higher altitudes, the frame rate was higher as well, averaging 25+ frames). Mind if I add that to the list of notebooks known to run FlightGear? | |||
Revision as of 20:51, 29 March 2010
I don't know why Windows version is almost twice as slow as the OSX's one. A wild guess would be because the WindowsXP drivers supplied by Apple are dated 14.11.2007. Probably other people with X3100 chipset could post their findings to compare. Leman 05:33, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
Acer Aspire 4530-6823
I got FlightGear 2.0.0 running on my Acer Aspire 4530-6823 notebook. The average FPS was 15, with both shaders on and off (at higher altitudes, the frame rate was higher as well, averaging 25+ frames). Mind if I add that to the list of notebooks known to run FlightGear?