Talk:FlightGear Headless: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Hudson based CI server is now available, which would directly benefit from a HEADLESS mode for regression testing purposes) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Doing this would mostly require standard situations or scenarios to have a repeatable runtime scenario for benchmarking/profiling, instrument and debugging FG | * Doing this would mostly require standard situations or scenarios to have a repeatable runtime scenario for benchmarking/profiling, instrument and debugging FG | ||
= Related Discussions = | = Related Discussions = | ||
* "although right now our test suite is pretty much zero - I did some work on that once, but it got lost in disk shuffles last year " [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg27924.html] | |||
* http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1647216&forum_id=128876 | * http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1647216&forum_id=128876 | ||
* http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg21928.html | * http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg21928.html | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 29 June 2010
Hudson based CI for FG
- http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Newsletter_June_2010#Server_wanted:_Continuous_Integration_for_FlightGear
- pursuing this, would allow for a number of regression tests and standard Linux tools to be similarly automated:
- gprof
- valgrind
- Doing this would mostly require standard situations or scenarios to have a repeatable runtime scenario for benchmarking/profiling, instrument and debugging FG
Related Discussions
- "although right now our test suite is pretty much zero - I did some work on that once, but it got lost in disk shuffles last year " [1]
- http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1647216&forum_id=128876
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg21928.html
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=003c01c9de85%2421a04ce0%2464e0e6a0%24%40net&forum_name=jsbsim-devel
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@flightgear.org/msg18434.html
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10274.html
- http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7806
- headless traffic injector
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg27033.html
Possible infrastructure
Have a look at Phoronix Test Suite (www.phoronix-test-suite.com) for a possible infrastructure when paired with phoromatic. (www.phoromatic.com).