Hi fellow wiki editors!

To help newly registered users get more familiar with the wiki (and maybe older users too) there is now a {{Welcome to the wiki}} template. Have a look at it and feel free to add it to new users discussion pages (and perhaps your own).

I have tried to keep the template short, but meaningful. /Johan G

Difference between revisions of "Talk:FlightGear Git"

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Repository link templates?)
(Repository link templates: Good idea, not sure on MacLauncher though)
Line 17: Line 17:
[[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 12:01, 20 May 2016 (EDT)
[[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 12:01, 20 May 2016 (EDT)
: ''Yes'' for the Windows-3rd-party/FGCom/TerraFS repositories; I'm ''not so sure'' for the MacLauncher one (the code has not seen an update in years). -- [[User:Elgaton|ElGaton]] ([[User talk:Elgaton|<tt>talk</tt> to me]]) 08:01, 21 May 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:01, 21 May 2016


forum posting

Feel free to add or link to this: http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=8270&p=93371#p93371 --Hooray 20:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

mob access

If this experiment is meant to become a community experience, for both developers and users, how about enabling mob access, too [1]? There are often people that are neither core developers, nor aspire to become one, but who are technical users who'd like to more easily submit patches. While most long-term FlightGear users know about the fact that "FlightGear life" takes places on the mailing lists, many others often just end up sharing patches via the forums, sf.net patch trackers or even via IRC. So, this would be an extremely easy way for potential contributors to more easily share local modifications with fellow users, without having any effect on any of the trusted main branches or organizational burden on the project lead, so it would sort of become a "sandbox" environment with "wild" code. Core developers could more easily keep track of patches submitted this way, too.--MILSTD 07:29, 4 February 2009 (EST)

The mob branch idea is intriguing, but it is so easy for anyone to set up their own forked flightgear repositories, especially on repo.or.cz, that I don't think it's necessary to enable the mob branch. It's really more useful to be able to say "pull the foo branch in my repository" than "pull my cool commit out of the mob branch."--Timoore 05:24, 5 February 2009 (EST)

Repository link templates

Hi Elgaton, I was wondering if you think it is worth creating repository link templates for the Windows-3rd-party, FGCom, terrafs, and MacLauncher git repositories for use in the table? I haven't seen any need anywhere else in the wiki for these yet.

Bugman (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2016 (EDT)

Yes for the Windows-3rd-party/FGCom/TerraFS repositories; I'm not so sure for the MacLauncher one (the code has not seen an update in years). -- ElGaton (talk to me) 08:01, 21 May 2016 (EDT)