Talk:Distributed node system for FlightGear: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (adding pointer to section about "remote properties")
 
(converted external link pointing on own wiki to internal links)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
= Also see discussions related to Remote Properties =
= Also see discussions related to Remote Properties =
Hi, if you are interested in creating a prototype implementation of a distributed property tree, you may also want to check out [http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Talk:Recommended_Property_Tree_Enhancements#Remote_Properties this section] which lists pointers to earlier discussions about enhancing the SGPropertyNode class so that it provides support for so called "remote properties". As you'll see by checking out the various links, this is a fairly old but extremely powerful idea that would have the potential to solve most concurrency/distribution but also synchronization issues. Also, please be aware that you will probably want to get in touch with the team of FlightGear core developers (preferably using the mailing list) if you are interested in any sort of core development, for example also in order to communicate your ideas and request feedback. --[[User:MILSTD|MILSTD]] 13:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, if you are interested in creating a prototype implementation of a distributed property tree, you may also want to check out [[Talk:Recommended_Property_Tree_Enhancements#Remote_Properties|this section]] which lists pointers to earlier discussions about enhancing the SGPropertyNode class so that it provides support for so called "remote properties". As you'll see by checking out the various links, this is a fairly old but extremely powerful idea that would have the potential to solve most concurrency/distribution but also synchronization issues. Also, please be aware that you will probably want to get in touch with the team of FlightGear core developers (preferably using the mailing list) if you are interested in any sort of core development, for example also in order to communicate your ideas and request feedback. --[[User:MILSTD|MILSTD]] 13:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:00, 19 December 2011

Also see discussions related to Remote Properties

Hi, if you are interested in creating a prototype implementation of a distributed property tree, you may also want to check out this section which lists pointers to earlier discussions about enhancing the SGPropertyNode class so that it provides support for so called "remote properties". As you'll see by checking out the various links, this is a fairly old but extremely powerful idea that would have the potential to solve most concurrency/distribution but also synchronization issues. Also, please be aware that you will probably want to get in touch with the team of FlightGear core developers (preferably using the mailing list) if you are interested in any sort of core development, for example also in order to communicate your ideas and request feedback. --MILSTD 13:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)