20,741
edits
Release plan: Difference between revisions
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=11863&p=183549#p183549
(http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=11863&p=183549#p183549) |
|||
| Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
* '''FGData related (Base Package)''': | * '''FGData related (Base Package)''': | ||
** aircraft included in the base package should not require DDS support [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=11863&p=183549#p183549] | |||
** a bunch of Intel GPU related issues were tracked down to be related to texture dimensions beyond 512x512 not being supported, suggested workarounds are mentioned at [http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=1100#c2] | ** a bunch of Intel GPU related issues were tracked down to be related to texture dimensions beyond 512x512 not being supported, suggested workarounds are mentioned at [http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=1100#c2] | ||
** "Funny how the 172P doesn't have it (crash detection via limits.nas). It is something like a default aircraft for the sim, isn't it? Which aircraft are considered the most "finished"?" [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=25&p=180198#p180157] | ** "Funny how the 172P doesn't have it (crash detection via limits.nas). It is something like a default aircraft for the sim, isn't it? Which aircraft are considered the most "finished"?" [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=25&p=180198#p180157] | ||