Release plan: Difference between revisions

m
→‎2.10: http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=19745&p=182926#p182926
(http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=18991&p=176183&hilit=viewport#p176183)
m (→‎2.10: http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=19745&p=182926#p182926)
Line 214: Line 214:
** a little irritation/frustration was caused due to the conflicting review statements concerning the new radio propagation code [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38905.html] [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38825.html] [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg33692.html] - some of this boiled down to coding style related issues, highlighting the fact that different core developers have different "coding styles" and requirements when reviewing merge requests, because we still lack an official "FlightGear coding style guide" [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38958.html]
** a little irritation/frustration was caused due to the conflicting review statements concerning the new radio propagation code [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38905.html] [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38825.html] [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg33692.html] - some of this boiled down to coding style related issues, highlighting the fact that different core developers have different "coding styles" and requirements when reviewing merge requests, because we still lack an official "FlightGear coding style guide" [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38958.html]
** according to Windows users, the installer created by jenkins could use some optimizations [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=19745]
** according to Windows users, the installer created by jenkins could use some optimizations [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=19745]
** a number of Windows7/Windows8 users reported issues that needed a "force 32/64 bit" workaround during startup [http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&p=182923#p182923][http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=19872&p=182759&hilit=#p182759][http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=19869&p=182724&hilit=#p182724]


* '''Better bug reports and troubleshooting''':
* '''Better bug reports and troubleshooting''':