Python in FlightGear
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is a stub. You can help the wiki by expanding it. |
Background
This is a follow up of a discussion that I have with one of the devs at fg weekend 2015.
My propose is that we include python 3 as an alternative for nasal. This mean not that nasal is bad, but I can writing code in python faster than nasal. (this is only my opinion and experience) Another plus for python re can create a standalone interface that connect to fgfs or play a flight from an recode session for cockpit building or testing new code. What is your considers about Python as an nasal alternative? Sorry this is short post, more in the future.— www2 (Dec 28th, 2015). FGPython an propose for Python as an nasal alternative.
(powered by Instant-Cquotes) |
Status
RFC