Portal:Developer: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (adding link to Hudson build server article)
m (adding WIP RFCs)
Line 150: Line 150:


* [[A local weather system]] - improving the FlightGear weather system to make it more configurable and feature rich
* [[A local weather system]] - improving the FlightGear weather system to make it more configurable and feature rich
* [[An Integrated AI Traffic System]] - improving the integration of the AI traffic system with the rest of FlightGear
* [[Autopilot Enhancements]] - enhancing the autopilot infrastructure.
* [[Autopilot Enhancements]] - enhancing the autopilot infrastructure.
* [[Backwards Compatibility Initiative]] - discussing possible ways to improve FlightGear's backwards compatibility.
* [[Backwards Compatibility Initiative]] - discussing possible ways to improve FlightGear's backwards compatibility.
Line 168: Line 169:
* [[Recommended Property Tree Enhancements]] - discussing possible property tree enhancements to help ensure integrity of crucial runtime state.
* [[Recommended Property Tree Enhancements]] - discussing possible property tree enhancements to help ensure integrity of crucial runtime state.
* [[Recommended Project Policies]] - discussing recommended policies for future contributions to the project.
* [[Recommended Project Policies]] - discussing recommended policies for future contributions to the project.
* [[Redesigning the Replay System]] - addressing the restrictions in the current implementation of the replay system
* [[Remote Properties]] - introduces a small but powerful extension to the property tree in order to allow properties to be maintained in a different (remote) instance of a property tree, that is transparently accessed using a network socket.  
* [[Remote Properties]] - introduces a small but powerful extension to the property tree in order to allow properties to be maintained in a different (remote) instance of a property tree, that is transparently accessed using a network socket.  
* [[Simplifying Aircraft Deployment]] - identifying potential steps to simplify deployment of FlightGear aircraft.
* [[Simplifying Aircraft Deployment]] - identifying potential steps to simplify deployment of FlightGear aircraft.


[[es:Portal:Desarrollo]]
[[es:Portal:Desarrollo]]

Revision as of 13:44, 28 June 2010

Developer - User - Pilot

The Developer Portal

This portal is for developers contributing to FlightGear. If you want to help with FlightGears development, it's a good idea to subscribe yourself to the FlightGear devel mailing list. The list archive is also available and should be searched before posting the same question.

Please choose a sub-portal:

The FlightGear project is looking for organizations/individuals who would be willing to help sponsor a fulltime project coordinator/manager to help oversee the overall development process If you are interested in helping or have anything else to contribute to this issue, please subscribe to the the FlightGear Devel mailing list to discuss details. (Note that the FlightGear project can apply for free funding/sponsoring with nlnet-applications are to be sent here-you can help prepare a template for applying: Funding Application)

Current Events, Efforts/Branches & Work in Progress

More...

Latest Organizational Issues

FlightGear Issues

Improvement Initiatives

More...

Compiling

Contributing

Code Internals

Todo

Done

HowTos

More...

Nasal scripting



Developer Documentation

RFC Topics

Clarification: In its current form, the RFC section is exclusively based on and covered by previous mailing list and forum discussions (as well as various wiki entries), as such it is not supposed to reflect work in progress (RFC="Request For Comments" and not WIP), but is rather to be seen as an attempt to provide comprehensive analyses and summaries of key issues identified in various FlightGear related discussions and feature requests (which are to be linked to in the corresponding resource sections, if that didn't yet take place, it's because of most of these RFCs being indeed WIP).

Thus, RFC entries are not meant to imply anyone "working" on any of these issues, in fact only because an RFC entry is listed here doesn't necessarily mean that work on that particular issue is prioritized or generally endorsed by the FlightGear community. These RFC documents are however intended to hopefully help increase and maintain awareness of long-standing issues and challenges affecting FlightGear's evolution and overall development progress in order to solicit community feedback about possible approaches to address these in an efficient and structured fashion. Anybody is welcome to comment on, help refine and develop new strategies to tackle the challenges presented in these and future RFCs.