Howto:Write a FlightGear Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
* FlightGear version to be reviewed, download location | * FlightGear version to be reviewed, download location | ||
* background of the reviewer (e.g. previous flight simulation experience) | * background of the reviewer (e.g. previous flight simulation experience) | ||
* target audience | |||
* focus of the review | |||
* expectations of the reviewer | * expectations of the reviewer | ||
* simulator performance | * simulator performance | ||
Line 67: | Line 69: | ||
* aircraft/airports tested | * aircraft/airports tested | ||
* summary (pros & cons, suggestions for improvement) | * summary (pros & cons, suggestions for improvement) | ||
* conclusion / final words | |||
== Content == | == Content == |
Revision as of 11:33, 22 February 2016
This article is a stub. You can help the wiki by expanding it. |
Release process |
---|
Objective
Provide a simple framework/guideline for people wanting to review FlightGear, to make sure that reviews are kept constructive and helpful, i.e. so that they can help guide the future of the program.
Why reviews matter
the whole reset/re-init work seems to be largely based on FlightGear reviews stating how the sim is unable to save/load/resume flights and change aircraft without restarting the whole simulator: FlightGear Sessions#Problem
Those reviews mentioned there predate the reset/re-init effort by several years, and while the original reviews may not be very objective, they did have /some/ merits - and it seems that some core developers do care about such reviews and are sufficiently motivated by reviews highlighting certain issues - for instance, Stuart used to be an avid participant in "usability" discussions, including reviews of FlightGear highlighting the lack of usability - equally, the Qt5 effort could be said to be aimed at making FG more accessbile. And the FlightGear multicore debate is seeing some attention via HLA - so people certainly care, it's just the timeframe that makes things appear very unresponsive |
Intro
Motivation
Things to cover
- FlightGear version to be reviewed, download location
- background of the reviewer (e.g. previous flight simulation experience)
- target audience
- focus of the review
- expectations of the reviewer
- simulator performance
- quality of visuals, audio/effects, aircraft systems
- operating system, hardware (graphics card, ram, cpu)
- settings used
- aircraft/airports tested
- summary (pros & cons, suggestions for improvement)
- conclusion / final words
Content
- Screenshots
- Youtube videos
Summary
Reviews
- http://www.golem.de/news/flightgear-2-6-0-open-source-flugsimulator-mit-verbesserter-ki-1202-89961.html
- http://www.tectonic.co.za/cooltool.php?coolid=1166
- http://games4mac.de/content_g4m/reviews/flightgear.php
- http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/flightgear
- http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/8-awesome-free-opensource-games-enjoy-windows-mac-linux/
- http://www.chip.de/downloads/FlightGear_15932278.html