High-Level Architecture: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
# It provides a very good framework to allow anyone to create components that interact with FlightGear using programming languages other than C/C++ (think Ada, Java, Python etc), which may be running in their own threads, and reside in separate binaries<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34196458/</ref>, which will be also easier to debug/troubleshoot (think regression testing, i.e. running a self-contained subsystem in a dedicated gdb/valgrind session), without having to know how to modify/patch and rebuild FlightGear.
# It provides a very good framework to allow anyone to create components that interact with FlightGear using programming languages other than C/C++ (think Ada, Java, Python etc), which may be running in their own threads, and reside in separate binaries<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34196458/</ref>, which will be also easier to debug/troubleshoot (think regression testing, i.e. running a self-contained subsystem in a dedicated gdb/valgrind session), without having to know how to modify/patch and rebuild FlightGear.


Stuart has started work on re-architecting parts of FlightGear to use HLA, though this is expected to be a multi-year project.  Anyone interested in the current status of development should subscribe to the Flightgear -devel mailing list.
As of late 2015, Stuart has started work on re-architecting parts of FlightGear to use HLA, though this is expected to be a multi-year project.  Anyone interested in the current status of development should subscribe to the Flightgear -devel mailing list.


{{FGCquote
{{FGCquote