High-Level Architecture: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 76: Line 76:


For some Subsystems split off from the existing FlightGear source, it's fairly easy to create an executable with its own property tree<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34632142/</ref> and have shared C++ code to map FOM objects to property values.  However, this is an implementation detail - the whole point of HLA and the FOM is that it makes no assumptions about what Federates do with the data.
For some Subsystems split off from the existing FlightGear source, it's fairly easy to create an executable with its own property tree<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34632142/</ref> and have shared C++ code to map FOM objects to property values.  However, this is an implementation detail - the whole point of HLA and the FOM is that it makes no assumptions about what Federates do with the data.
Regarding weather, in a HLA/RTI context the way to do this would be to have a weather engine as an RTI Federate. This would run any required weather simulation, and pass (very) local weather conditions to each of the aircraft/tower/windsock in the simulation, plus publish position information on clouds for use by visualiation engines.<ref>{{cite web
  |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35595300/
  |title  =  <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] Traffic 2020: Towards a new Development
Model for FlightGear AI Traffic </nowiki>
  |author =  <nowiki> Stuart Buchanan </nowiki>
  |date  =  Jan 10th, 2017
  |added  =  Jan 10th, 2017
  |script_version = 0.40
  }}</ref>


==Current Status ==
==Current Status ==
Last updated: (19/02/2016)
Last updated: (13/01/2017)
 
Stuart is cautiously optimistic that he may be able to provide the start of a HLA implementation quite soon, as one of the blocking factors may be resolved soon.<ref>{{cite web
  |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35595300/
  |title  =  <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] Traffic 2020: Towards a new Development
Model for FlightGear AI Traffic </nowiki>
  |author =  <nowiki> Stuart Buchanan </nowiki>
  |date  =  Jan 10th, 2017
  |added  =  Jan 10th, 2017
  |script_version = 0.40
  }}</ref>
 


Currently, there is some very old HLA support in SimGear. This is very out of date and should be ignored.
Currently, there is some very old HLA support in SimGear. This is very out of date and should be ignored.

Navigation menu