20,741
edits
FG1000: Difference between revisions
→Performance
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
we need to be realistic here: The G1000 is a fairly significant piece of computer hardware that we're going to emulate. It's not going to be "free" particularly for those on older hardware that's already struggling. However, hopefully we can offload a chunk of the logic (route management, autopilot/flight director) to the core, and do things like offline generation of terrain maps to | we need to be realistic here: The G1000 is a fairly significant piece of computer hardware that we're going to emulate. It's not going to be "free" particularly for those on older hardware that's already struggling. However, hopefully we can offload a chunk of the logic (route management, autopilot/flight director) to the core, and do things like offline generation of terrain maps to minimize the impact.<ref>{{cite web | ||
|url = https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35926745/ | |url = https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35926745/ | ||
|title = <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: FlightGear and the changing state of | |title = <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: FlightGear and the changing state of | ||