FFGo: Difference between revisions

190 bytes added ,  17 March 2016
m
→‎Installing FFGo and its dependencies: Point to the Command_line of the wiki where appropriate
m (→‎Installation tips: Use the Note template for nicer formatting)
m (→‎Installing FFGo and its dependencies: Point to the Command_line of the wiki where appropriate)
Line 184: Line 184:
       </li>
       </li>
       <li>
       <li>
         If you are not comfortable with the command line (“Command Prompt”),
         If you are not comfortable with the [[Command_line|command line]]
        it is suggested you choose <i>Add python.exe to Path</i> (or <i>Add
        (“Command Prompt”), it is suggested you choose <i>Add python.exe to
        Python X.Y to PATH</i>: the precise wording depends on the Python
        Path</i> (or <i>Add Python X.Y to PATH</i>: the precise wording
        version). This way, you will be able to run the <tt>pip</tt> and
        depends on the Python version). This way, you will be able to run the
        <tt>ffgo</tt> programs directly at the Command Prompt without having
        <tt>pip</tt> and <tt>ffgo</tt> programs directly at the Command Prompt
        to specify their full paths.
        without having to specify their full paths.


         <p>
         <p>
Line 227: Line 227:
   </li>
   </li>
   <li>
   <li>
     Open a terminal, aka “Command Prompt”:
     Open a terminal, also known as “Command Prompt”:


     <p>
     <p>
Line 235: Line 235:
       Apparently (according to Google, see for yourself), on Windows 10, this
       Apparently (according to Google, see for yourself), on Windows 10, this
       can (also?) be done with the <tt>Windows+X</tt> keyboard shortcut, then
       can (also?) be done with the <tt>Windows+X</tt> keyboard shortcut, then
       choosing <i>Command Prompt</i> in the menu that should appear.
       choosing <i>Command Prompt</i> in the menu that should appear. If you
      have never used the Command Prompt on Windows, reading the
      [[Command_line|Command line page on the wiki]] would certainly be a good
      idea.
     </p>
     </p>
   </li>
   </li>
377

edits