Cppunit effort: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


== Objective ==
== Objective ==
The aim is to make it very easy for people to write unit or system/functional tests for fgfs (rather than simgear), which should make it much easier for new developers to dive into the flightgear sources. A long term goal might be to have good test coverage of the whole binary so that fgfs is harder to break and is more stable.<ref>{{cite web
  |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/36281748/
  |title  =  <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] Questions about TestSuite </nowiki>
  |author =  <nowiki> Edward d'Auvergne </nowiki>
  |date  =  Apr 1st, 2018
  |added  =  Apr 1st, 2018
  |script_version = 0.36
  }}</ref>


== Background ==
== Background ==

Revision as of 16:17, 2 April 2018

cppunit-foo
Started in 07/2017
Description foo
Contributor(s) Bugman
Status Under active development as of 04/2018
Folders foo
Changelog foo
This article is a stub. You can help the wiki by expanding it.

Status

Objective

The aim is to make it very easy for people to write unit or system/functional tests for fgfs (rather than simgear), which should make it much easier for new developers to dive into the flightgear sources. A long term goal might be to have good test coverage of the whole binary so that fgfs is harder to break and is more stable.[1]

Background

Related

References
  1. Edward d'Auvergne  (Apr 1st, 2018).  Re: [Flightgear-devel] Questions about TestSuite .