Cessna 182S: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
John Denker (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
3d Cockpit: | 3d Cockpit: | ||
* cockpit instruments do light at night, but the cockpit itself stays dark | * cockpit instruments do light at night, but the cockpit itself stays dark, which means (among other things) the flap handle can't be seen | ||
* cockpit instruments can be seen through the rudder controls, they overlay the rudder controls | * cockpit instruments can be seen through the rudder controls, they overlay the rudder controls | ||
* can't hear sound when pressing the switches and levers in the cockpit | * can't hear sound when pressing the switches and levers in the cockpit | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* pilot seat is not available | * pilot seat is not available | ||
* no pilot or copilot present | * no pilot or copilot present | ||
General: | General: | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* aircraft is flipped when pressing the reset button | * aircraft is flipped when pressing the reset button | ||
* aircraft has the wrong elevation (approximately 20 meter above the runway) after pressing the reset key | * aircraft has the wrong elevation (approximately 20 meter above the runway) after pressing the reset key | ||
* horizon instrument is in wrong position after doing some wild flying maneuvers. | |||
* The C182 model does not realistically capture the flap/power/trim interaction. In the model, extending the flaps seems to cause a nose-down pitching moment, which is the wrong direction. And the power-dependence of the effect is not realistically modelled. In a real C182 / C172 / C152 / C150, the flap/trim interaction can be described as follows: | |||
** Changing the flap setting has little effect when the engine is at idle. | |||
** Changing the power setting has little effect when the flaps are in the retracted position. | |||
** However, there is a multiplicative effect: Adding power causes a nose-up pitching moment when flaps are in an extended position. Or, to say the same thing, extending the flaps causes a nose-up pitching moment. The effect is in proportion to the amount of power being developed *times* the amount of flap deflection. | |||
* The model seems never to consume any fuel. I dumped the property list and discovered that engines/engine/fuel-flow-gph takes on reasonable values and tracks the throttle setting, while engines/engine/fuel-flow_pph remained stuck at zero. This is a particularly bad disconnect, since apparently the latter is what gets integrated to calculate engines/engine/fuel-consumed-lbs. | |||
Desirable creeping features: | |||
* Retractible landing gear. This would increase the value of the model for "transition training" for pilots transitioning into complex aircraft. | |||
== Non-Bugs == | |||
* horizon instrument is in wrong position after doing some wild flying maneuvers. This is a realistic model of a tumbled gyro. | |||
* cockpit window has no windscreen wipers. This is realistic. | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 10 January 2007
Development status/Issues/Todo
c182-2dpanel Cessna 182 (2D panel)
Outside:
- cockpit instruments can be seen through the aileron
- ailerons on the right side are not animated
- no cockpit light at night visible
- no pilot and co pilot visible
- wings are not textured
- aircraft has no shadow
- no aircraft light available
3d Cockpit:
- cockpit instruments do light at night, but the cockpit itself stays dark, which means (among other things) the flap handle can't be seen
- cockpit instruments can be seen through the rudder controls, they overlay the rudder controls
- can't hear sound when pressing the switches and levers in the cockpit
- no elevator trim control available
- no rudder control pedals available
- cockpit instruments look flat, they don't have a 3d look
- cockit is not textured
- pilot seat is not available
- no pilot or copilot present
General:
- engine sound in cockpit does not differ from outside engine sound
- hud is not available
- aircraft is flipped when pressing the reset button
- aircraft has the wrong elevation (approximately 20 meter above the runway) after pressing the reset key
- The C182 model does not realistically capture the flap/power/trim interaction. In the model, extending the flaps seems to cause a nose-down pitching moment, which is the wrong direction. And the power-dependence of the effect is not realistically modelled. In a real C182 / C172 / C152 / C150, the flap/trim interaction can be described as follows:
- Changing the flap setting has little effect when the engine is at idle.
- Changing the power setting has little effect when the flaps are in the retracted position.
- However, there is a multiplicative effect: Adding power causes a nose-up pitching moment when flaps are in an extended position. Or, to say the same thing, extending the flaps causes a nose-up pitching moment. The effect is in proportion to the amount of power being developed *times* the amount of flap deflection.
- The model seems never to consume any fuel. I dumped the property list and discovered that engines/engine/fuel-flow-gph takes on reasonable values and tracks the throttle setting, while engines/engine/fuel-flow_pph remained stuck at zero. This is a particularly bad disconnect, since apparently the latter is what gets integrated to calculate engines/engine/fuel-consumed-lbs.
Desirable creeping features:
- Retractible landing gear. This would increase the value of the model for "transition training" for pilots transitioning into complex aircraft.
Non-Bugs
- horizon instrument is in wrong position after doing some wild flying maneuvers. This is a realistic model of a tumbled gyro.
- cockpit window has no windscreen wipers. This is realistic.