Catalog metadata: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Related content: +link: Hangar catalog)
m (→‎Eras: add 2020s)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Package Management}}
{{Package Management}}


== Status / News ==
== Status/news ==
Now that James has merged the preview and [[Splash Screens|splash screen changes]], he wants to start a concerted effort to improve the metadata of all the aircraft in FGaddon. This means:  
Now that James has merged the preview and [[splash screen]] changes, he wants to start a concerted effort to improve the metadata of all the aircraft in FGaddon. This means:  


* ensuring there’s a suitable ‘long' description  
* Ensuring there is a suitable "long" description  
* adding / updating ratings  
* Adding or updating ratings  
* ensuring variant / primary info is correct  
* Ensuring variant or primary info is correct  
* ideally adapting to the new preview/splash system, (but not required)  
* Ideally adapting to the new preview/splash system (but not required)  
* adding metadata tags, for better searching/usability the future  
* Adding metadata tags, for better searching/usability the future  


All of these are intended to help users browsing the aircraft, via the launcher or other methods. James's proposal is to post about this on the forum, and ask for volunteers to pick aircraft, and submit patches / updates to myself and some other willing reviewers (Stuart has also volunteered as reviewer, more people are welcome). Aside form ensuring high quality, we also need to ensure that aircraft maintainers are given the opportunity to update their own aircraft. Any co-volunteers to manage the process, and especially suggestions on how to manage this in a way that is friendly towards aircraft maintainers, but also gives a reasonable chance, that 90% of aircraft in FGaddon have up-to-date metatdata by the next release, are welcome. I’m sure we will have the usual debate on subjectivity of ratings, but, that’s another thing the reviewers will have to deal with. (James Turner suggested there’s some criteria on the wiki from the last time we did this?) (There’s a task on me to link the tagging system into the aircraft search, so that searching on ‘fighter’ or ‘glass-cockpit’ brings up appropriate matches. This tends to work out anyway when aircraft have a long-description text, but it’s still very beneficial to the launcher to have some meta-data about how aircraft are used)
All of these are intended to help users browsing the aircraft, via the launcher or other methods. The proposal by James is to post about this on the forum, and ask for volunteers to pick aircraft, and submit patches or updates to myself and some other willing reviewers (Stuart has also volunteered as reviewer, but more people are welcome). Aside form ensuring high quality, we also need to ensure that aircraft maintainers are given the opportunity to update their own aircraft. Any co-volunteers to manage the process, and especially suggestions on how to manage this in a way that is friendly towards aircraft maintainers, but also gives a reasonable chance that 90% of aircraft in FGaddon have up to date metatdata by the next release, are welcome. I am sure we will have the usual debate on subjectivity of ratings, but, that’s another thing the reviewers will have to deal with. (James Turner suggested there is some criteria on the wiki from the last time we did this?) (There is a task on me to link the tagging system into the aircraft search, so that searching on "fighter" or "glass-cockpit" brings up appropriate matches. This tends to work out anyway when aircraft have a long-description text, but it is still very beneficial to the launcher to have some meta-data about how aircraft are used).<ref>{{cite web
<ref>{{cite web
   |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35688820/  
   |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35688820/  
   |title = <nowiki>[Flightgear-devel] Improving FGaddon aircraft meta-data </nowiki>
   |title = <nowiki>[Flightgear-devel] Improving FGaddon aircraft meta-data </nowiki>
Line 22: Line 21:
   }}</ref>
   }}</ref>


==Catalogs==
== Catalogs ==
 
The overall aim is to support a decentralized development system with the only central point being the aircraft package manager for end users.<ref>{{cite web  
The overall aim is to support a decentralized development system with the only central point being the aircraft package manager for end users.
<ref>{{cite web  
     |url = http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33413096/
     |url = http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33413096/
     |title = <nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA split without Aircraft. Addon in SVN. (re)Suggesting a Submodule approach. (Re)Proposing a</nowiki>
     |title = <nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA split without Aircraft. Addon in SVN. (re)Suggesting a Submodule approach. (Re)Proposing a</nowiki>
Line 32: Line 29:
}}</ref>.  Users can simply add a hangar URL for FGUK, Lake of Constance or similar, and browse those aircraft within the launcher.   
}}</ref>.  Users can simply add a hangar URL for FGUK, Lake of Constance or similar, and browse those aircraft within the launcher.   


Most importantly we can improve the end-user browsing and discovery experience by enforcing some required meta-data, images and similar in the catalogs, and we can manage the install process so that users don’t get confused about where to move an aircraft file.
Most importantly we can improve the end-user browsing and discovery experience by enforcing some required meta-data, images and similar in the catalogs, and we can manage the install process so that users don’t get confused about where to move an aircraft file.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33586444/
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33586444/
     |title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA and Jenkins </nowiki>
     |title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA and Jenkins </nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
Line 39: Line 35:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


fgmeta contains a 'create_catalog.py' script which runs over fgaddon but could be used against another aircraft store containing multiple aircraft to generate a catalog used by the launcher in combination with a webhost to publish aircraft to users.
FGMeta contains a <code>create_catalog.py</code> script which runs over FGAddon but could be used against another aircraft store containing multiple aircraft to generate a catalog used by the launcher in combination with a webhost to publish aircraft to users.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33550567/
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33550567/
     | title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGData size reduction </nowiki>
     | title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGData size reduction </nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
Line 46: Line 41:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The catalog is just an XML file, and the other files needed are the thumbnail images for each package, and the package .zips themselves; the system is deliberately designed to be host-able statically on any web provider. The ‘create_catalog.py’ gives one example of creating a suitable catalog XML file, but any other approach is also valid.
The catalog is just an XML file, and the other files needed are the thumbnail images for each package, and the package Zip files themselves; The system is deliberately designed to be able to be hosted statically on any web provider. The <code>create_catalog.py</code> gives one example of creating a suitable catalog XML file, but any other approach is also valid.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33586444/
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33586444/
     |title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA and Jenkins</nowiki>
     |title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGDATA and Jenkins</nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
     |author=<nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
Line 56: Line 50:
{{Note|Please do not extend this list without discussion and agreement.}}
{{Note|Please do not extend this list without discussion and agreement.}}


The tags are translation / search keys, not human-readable strings. Any additions or changes mean updated translation files. The catalog-generator script will reject aircraft with non-standard tags!
The tags are translation and search keys, not human-readable strings. Any additions or changes mean updated translation files. The catalog-generator script will reject aircraft with non-standard tags!


The definitive list of tags can be found here: https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/fgmeta/ci/next/tree/catalog/catalogTags.py
The definitive list of tags can be found here: https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/fgmeta/ci/next/tree/python3-flightgear/flightgear/meta/aircraft_catalogs/catalogTags.py
Tags are designed to be inclusive, not exclusive, to give the broadest range of search results. If multiple tags apply, use them. The DC-3 for example have had multiple civilian and military roles.


Tags are designed to be inclusive, not exclusive, to give the broadest range of search results. If multiple tags apply, use them - for example the DC-3 has had multiple civilian and military roles.
=== Aircraft types ===


=== Aircraft types ===
* <code>aerobatic</code>
* ga
* <code>airship</code>
* helicopter
* <code>balloon</code>
* fighter
* <code>bizjet</code>
* interceptor
* <code>bomber</code>
* glider - But does this includes the Space Shuttle, Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipeOne, as well?
* <code>cargo</code>
* spaceship
* <code>carrier</code>
* bomber
* <code>fighter</code>
* tanker
* <code>ga</code>
* cargo
* <code>glider</code>
* transport
* <code>groundvehicle</code>
* bizjet - Not just for jets, but I can't think of a better term
* <code>helicopter</code>
* reconnaissance
* <code>interceptor</code>
* airship
* <code>passenger</code>
* balloon
* <code>racer</code>
* trainer - Used in a pilot training role
* <code>spaceship</code>
* aerobatic
* <code>tanker</code>
* ultralight
* <code>trainer</code>
* <code>transport</code>
* <code>ultralight</code>
* <code>unpowered</code>
* <code>uav</code>
* <code>reconnaissance</code>
* <code>seacraft</code>
* <code>crop-duster</code>
* <code>bush-plane</code>


=== Manufacturers ===
=== Manufacturers ===
Intention here is to provide logical groupings, not to track corporate history - so the MD-80 and MD-11 would get the 'douglas' tag, which will likely translate to 'Douglas / McDonell-Douglas' in the UI. The 717 could get the boeing and douglas tags. Also not supposed to be an exhaustive list, this is so we can search on 'all glass-cockpit Boeing and Airbus aircraft'. It might be worth actively lying in the tags, i.e group all Hawker-Siddley / BAC / Avro aircraft under the Vickers tag.
The intention here is to provide logical groupings, not to track corporate history. For example the MD-80 and MD-11 would get the <code>douglas</code> tag, which will likely translate to "Douglas / McDonell-Douglas" in the user interface. The Boeing 717 could get the <code>boeing</code> and <code>douglas</code> tags. Also it is not supposed to be an exhaustive list. This is so we for example can search for "all glass-cockpit Boeing and Airbus aircraft". It might be worth actively lying in the tags, in essence group all Hawker-Siddley/BAC/Avro aircraft under the <code>vickers</code> tag.
 
* <code>airbus</code>
* <code>antonov</code>
* <code>arado</code>
* <code>atr</code>
* <code>avro</code>
* <code>bae</code>
* <code>bell</code>
* <code>bleriot</code>
* <code>boeing</code>
* <code>bombardier</code>
* <code>caudron</code>
* <code>cessna</code>
* <code>consolidated</code>
* <code>dassault</code>
* <code>diamond</code>
* <code>dornier</code>
* <code>douglas</code>
* <code>embraer</code>
* <code>eurocopter</code>
* <code>fairchild</code>
* <code>fairey</code>
* <code>focke-wulf</code>
* <code>fokker</code>
* <code>general-dynamics</code>
* <code>gotha</code>
* <code>grumman</code>
* <code>handley-page</code>
* <code>hawker</code>
* <code>heinkel</code>
* <code>ilyushin</code>
* <code>junkers</code>
* <code>kawasaki</code>
* <code>lockheed</code>
* <code>mc-donnell-douglas</code>
* <code>messerschmitt</code>
* <code>mikoyan-gurevich</code>
* <code>mitsubishi</code>
* <code>north-american</code>
* <code>northrop</code>
* <code>pilatus</code>
* <code>piper</code>
* <code>republic</code>
* <code>robin</code>
* <code>rockwell</code>
* <code>saab</code>
* <code>short</code>
* <code>sopwith</code>
* <code>spad</code>
* <code>sukhoi</code>
* <code>supermarine</code>
* <code>tupolev</code>
* <code>vickers</code>
* <code>vought</code>
* <code>wright</code>
* <code>yakovlev</code>


* airbus
* avro
* bell
* boeing
* bombardier
* cessna
* dassault
* diamond
* douglas
* embraer
* eurocopter
* fairchild
* fairey
* fokker
* grumman
* lockheed
* pilatus
* piper
* robin
* vickers
* vought


=== Eras ===
=== Eras ===
Logical groupings, not historical accuracy - some aircraft are going to have a lot of these, e.g. the B-52. Again the goal is intelligent searches: 'show me all WW2 fighters'. Would like to avoid this getting political too, comments on that are welcome
Logical groupings, not historical accuracy. Some aircraft are going to have a lot of these, for example the B-52. Again the goal is intelligent searches: "show me all WW2 fighters". Wee would like to avoid this getting political too and comments on that are welcome.


* 1910s
* <code>1910s</code>
* 1920s
* <code>1920s</code>
* 1930s
* <code>1930s</code>
* 1940s
* <code>1940s</code>
* 1950s
* <code>1950s</code>
* 1960s
* <code>1960s</code>
* 1970s
* <code>1970s</code>
* 1980s
* <code>1980s</code>
* 1990s
* <code>1990s</code>
* 2000s
* <code>2000s</code>
* 2010s
* <code>2010s</code>
* coldwar
* <code>2020s</code>
* early-pioneers
* <code>coldwar</code>
* golden-age
* <code>early-pioneers</code>
* gulfwar1
* <code>golden-age</code>
* gulfwar2
* <code>gulfwar1</code>
* vietnam
* <code>gulfwar2</code>
* ww1
* <code>vietnam</code>
* ww2
* <code>ww1</code>
* <code>ww2</code>


=== Aircraft Features ===
=== Aircraft Features ===
This could get long, as always trying to focus on tags people might search on - 'show me all the VTOL aircraft' or 'show me all the biplanes'. Some will be very useful in improving the user-experience, if the plane is tagged with seaplane we might be able to force a water start (not for amphibious obviously).
This could get long, as always trying to focus on tags people might search for, for example: "show me all the VTOL aircraft" or "show me all the biplanes". Some will be very useful in improving the user experience; If the plane is tagged with seaplane we might be able to force a water start (but not for amphibious aircraft obviously).


* prototype
* <code>aerobatic</code>
* experimental - For X1 and similar X-planes
* <code>airship</code>
* ifr - Panel and equipment (radios, lighting) suitable for IFR flight
* <code>amphibious</code>
* fixed-gear
* <code>biplane</code>
* retractable-gear
* <code>canard</code> - Canard planform
* tail-dragger
* <code>castering-wheel</code>
* carrier-hook - Do we need a separate tag for carrier-capable?
* <code>combat</code>
* stol - For short-takeoff
* <code>delta</code> - Delta planform; Vulcan, Concorde, Space Shuttle
* vtol - For the Harrier, F-35 if it ever works, and the Osprey
* <code>etops</code> - ETOPS capable aircraft, presumably implies twin-engined
* floats
* <code>experimental</code> - For X1 and similar X-planes
* amphibious
* <code>fictional</code>
* canard - Canard planform
* <code>fixed-gear</code>
* delta - Delta planform; Vulcan, Concorde, Space Shuttle
* <code>floats</code>
* variable-geometry - For Tomcats and the like
* <code>glass-cockpit</code>
* supersonic
* <code>low-wing</code>
* glass-cockpit
* <code>mid-wing</code>
* refuel - Supports air-to-air refeuling
* <code>high-wing</code>
* seaplane - Flying boat or float plane
* <code>h-tail</code>
* etops - ETOPS capable aircraft, presumably implies twin-engined
* <code>hud</code>
* biplane
* <code>ifr</code> - Panel and equipment (radios, lighting) suitable for IFR flight
* triplane
* <code>lifting-body</code>
* pressurised - Pressurised cabin
* <code>pressurised</code> - Pressurised cabin
* wing-fold - usually for carrier aircraft
* <code>prototype</code>
* <code>refuel</code> - Supports air-to-air refeuling
* <code>retractable-gear</code>
* <code>seaplane</code> - Flying boat or float plane
* <code>skis</code>
* <code>stol</code> - For short-takeoff
* <code>supersonic</code>
* <code>supercharger</code>
* <code>t-tail</code>
* <code>tail-dragger</code>
* <code>tricycle</code>
* <code>tail-hook</code>
* <code>triplane</code>
* <code>twin-boom</code>
* <code>v-tail</code>
* <code>variable-geometry</code> - For Tomcats and the like
* <code>vtol</code> - For the Harrier, F-35, and the Osprey
* <code>wing-fold</code> - usually for carrier aircraft
* <code>water-drop</code>


=== FlightGear Features ===
=== FlightGear Features ===
* combat - Support this various MP combat / bomb-able options
* <code>combat</code> - Support this various MP combat / bomb-able options
* dual-controls - Supports copilot over MP
* <code>dual-controls</code> - Supports copilot over MP
* tow - Supports glider towing over MP
* <code>tow</code> - Supports glider [[towing]] over MP
* rembrandt - Supports Rembrandt, obviously
* <code>rembrandt</code> - Supports Rembrandt, obviously


=== Propulsion ===
=== Propulsion ===
* piston
* <code>afterburner</code>
* radial - Radial piston engined
* <code>diesel</code>
* diesel
* <code>electric</code> - For power-assisted gliders, mostly.
* jet
* <code>jet</code>
* turboprop
* <code>propeller</code>
* 1-engine
* <code>piston</code>
* 2-engine
* <code>radial</code> - Radial piston engined
* 3-engine
* <code>rocket</code>
* 4-engine
* <code>single-engine</code>
* turbocharged - For pistons with a turbo-charger
* <code>supercharged</code>
* afterburner
* <code>turboprop</code> - For pistons with a turbo-charger
* rocket
* <code>twin-engine</code>
* electric - For power-assisted gliders, mostly.
* <code>four-engine</code>
* unpowered - Balloons, etc
* <code>variable-pitch</code>
* <code>fixed-pitch</code>


== Examples ==
== Examples ==
* B-52 would have: bomber, jet. boeing, coldwar, 1960s, vietnam, 1970s, 1980s, gulfwar1, nato, refuel, retractable-gear, ifr
* B-52 would have: <code>bomber</code>, <code>jet</code>, <code>boeing</code>, <code>coldwar</code>, <code>1960s</code>, <code>vietnam</code>, <code>1970s</code>, <code>1980s</code>, <code>gulfwar1</code>, <code>nato</code>, <code>refuel</code>, <code>retractable-gear</code> and <code>ifr</code>.
* Citation would have: cessna, bizjet, jet, 2-engine, glass-cockpit, ifr, retractable-gear
* Citation would have: <code>cessna</code>, <code>bizjet</code>, <code>jet</code>, <code>2-engine</code>, <code>glass-cockpit</code>, <code>ifr</code> and <code>retractable-gear</code>.
* Cub would have: piper, piston, 1-engine, ga, trainer, fixed-gear, 1930s, ww2, tail-dragger
* Cub would have: <code>piper</code>, <code>piston</code>, <code>1-engine</code>, <code>ga</code>, <code>trainer</code>, <code>fixed-gear</code>, <code>1930s</code>, <code>ww2</code> and <code>tail-dragger</code>.


== Adding metadata to aircraft ==
== Adding metadata to aircraft ==
The tags are added to or included into the sim section of the -set.xml file(s) like for example below:
The tags are added to or included into the <code><nowiki><sim></nowiki></code> section of the [[Aircraft-set.xml]] file(s), like for example below:


<syntaxhighlight lang="xml">
<syntaxhighlight lang="xml">
Line 190: Line 248:


<PropertyList>
<PropertyList>
<!-- ... -->


  <sim>
  <sim>
  <!-- ... -->


   <tags>
   <tags>
Line 203: Line 265:
   <tag>ifr</tag>
   <tag>ifr</tag>
   </tags>
   </tags>
  <!-- ... -->


  </sim>
  </sim>
<!-- ... -->


</PropertyList>
</PropertyList>
Line 217: Line 283:
* [[Aircraft rating system]]
* [[Aircraft rating system]]
* [[Aircraft-set.xml]]
* [[Aircraft-set.xml]]
* [[FlightGear hangars#Third party sites]] - List of third-party hangars, of which some have an <code>catalog.xml</code> file.
* [[Hangar catalog]]
* [[Hangar catalog]]
* [[Simplifying Aircraft Deployment]]
* [[Simplifying Aircraft Deployment]]


=== Forum topics ===
=== Forum topics ===
* [https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31915 Help tag aircraft]
* {{forum link|t=31915|text=Help tag aircraft}} (March-June 2017)


=== Developer mailing list threads ===
=== Developer mailing list threads ===
Line 227: Line 294:


=== Source code ===
=== Source code ===
* https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/fgmeta/ci/next/tree/catalog/catalogTags.py
* {{fgmeta source|path=catalog/catalogTags.py}}


[[Category:Core development projects]]
[[Category:Core development projects]]
[[Category:Aircraft enhancement]]

Latest revision as of 11:32, 3 January 2023

Tags with catalog metadata can be added to aircraft to help searching and filtering them, for example in the launcher or future versions of the aircraft center, so that a user can quicker find the aircraft of interest.

Status/news

Now that James has merged the preview and splash screen changes, he wants to start a concerted effort to improve the metadata of all the aircraft in FGaddon. This means:

  • Ensuring there is a suitable "long" description
  • Adding or updating ratings
  • Ensuring variant or primary info is correct
  • Ideally adapting to the new preview/splash system (but not required)
  • Adding metadata tags, for better searching/usability the future

All of these are intended to help users browsing the aircraft, via the launcher or other methods. The proposal by James is to post about this on the forum, and ask for volunteers to pick aircraft, and submit patches or updates to myself and some other willing reviewers (Stuart has also volunteered as reviewer, but more people are welcome). Aside form ensuring high quality, we also need to ensure that aircraft maintainers are given the opportunity to update their own aircraft. Any co-volunteers to manage the process, and especially suggestions on how to manage this in a way that is friendly towards aircraft maintainers, but also gives a reasonable chance that 90% of aircraft in FGaddon have up to date metatdata by the next release, are welcome. I am sure we will have the usual debate on subjectivity of ratings, but, that’s another thing the reviewers will have to deal with. (James Turner suggested there is some criteria on the wiki from the last time we did this?) (There is a task on me to link the tagging system into the aircraft search, so that searching on "fighter" or "glass-cockpit" brings up appropriate matches. This tends to work out anyway when aircraft have a long-description text, but it is still very beneficial to the launcher to have some meta-data about how aircraft are used).[1]

Catalogs

The overall aim is to support a decentralized development system with the only central point being the aircraft package manager for end users.[2]. Users can simply add a hangar URL for FGUK, Lake of Constance or similar, and browse those aircraft within the launcher.

Most importantly we can improve the end-user browsing and discovery experience by enforcing some required meta-data, images and similar in the catalogs, and we can manage the install process so that users don’t get confused about where to move an aircraft file.[3]

FGMeta contains a create_catalog.py script which runs over FGAddon but could be used against another aircraft store containing multiple aircraft to generate a catalog used by the launcher in combination with a webhost to publish aircraft to users.[4]

The catalog is just an XML file, and the other files needed are the thumbnail images for each package, and the package Zip files themselves; The system is deliberately designed to be able to be hosted statically on any web provider. The create_catalog.py gives one example of creating a suitable catalog XML file, but any other approach is also valid.[5]

Supported Tags

Note  Please do not extend this list without discussion and agreement.

The tags are translation and search keys, not human-readable strings. Any additions or changes mean updated translation files. The catalog-generator script will reject aircraft with non-standard tags!

The definitive list of tags can be found here: https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/fgmeta/ci/next/tree/python3-flightgear/flightgear/meta/aircraft_catalogs/catalogTags.py Tags are designed to be inclusive, not exclusive, to give the broadest range of search results. If multiple tags apply, use them. The DC-3 for example have had multiple civilian and military roles.

Aircraft types

  • aerobatic
  • airship
  • balloon
  • bizjet
  • bomber
  • cargo
  • carrier
  • fighter
  • ga
  • glider
  • groundvehicle
  • helicopter
  • interceptor
  • passenger
  • racer
  • spaceship
  • tanker
  • trainer
  • transport
  • ultralight
  • unpowered
  • uav
  • reconnaissance
  • seacraft
  • crop-duster
  • bush-plane

Manufacturers

The intention here is to provide logical groupings, not to track corporate history. For example the MD-80 and MD-11 would get the douglas tag, which will likely translate to "Douglas / McDonell-Douglas" in the user interface. The Boeing 717 could get the boeing and douglas tags. Also it is not supposed to be an exhaustive list. This is so we for example can search for "all glass-cockpit Boeing and Airbus aircraft". It might be worth actively lying in the tags, in essence group all Hawker-Siddley/BAC/Avro aircraft under the vickers tag.

  • airbus
  • antonov
  • arado
  • atr
  • avro
  • bae
  • bell
  • bleriot
  • boeing
  • bombardier
  • caudron
  • cessna
  • consolidated
  • dassault
  • diamond
  • dornier
  • douglas
  • embraer
  • eurocopter
  • fairchild
  • fairey
  • focke-wulf
  • fokker
  • general-dynamics
  • gotha
  • grumman
  • handley-page
  • hawker
  • heinkel
  • ilyushin
  • junkers
  • kawasaki
  • lockheed
  • mc-donnell-douglas
  • messerschmitt
  • mikoyan-gurevich
  • mitsubishi
  • north-american
  • northrop
  • pilatus
  • piper
  • republic
  • robin
  • rockwell
  • saab
  • short
  • sopwith
  • spad
  • sukhoi
  • supermarine
  • tupolev
  • vickers
  • vought
  • wright
  • yakovlev


Eras

Logical groupings, not historical accuracy. Some aircraft are going to have a lot of these, for example the B-52. Again the goal is intelligent searches: "show me all WW2 fighters". Wee would like to avoid this getting political too and comments on that are welcome.

  • 1910s
  • 1920s
  • 1930s
  • 1940s
  • 1950s
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000s
  • 2010s
  • 2020s
  • coldwar
  • early-pioneers
  • golden-age
  • gulfwar1
  • gulfwar2
  • vietnam
  • ww1
  • ww2

Aircraft Features

This could get long, as always trying to focus on tags people might search for, for example: "show me all the VTOL aircraft" or "show me all the biplanes". Some will be very useful in improving the user experience; If the plane is tagged with seaplane we might be able to force a water start (but not for amphibious aircraft obviously).

  • aerobatic
  • airship
  • amphibious
  • biplane
  • canard - Canard planform
  • castering-wheel
  • combat
  • delta - Delta planform; Vulcan, Concorde, Space Shuttle
  • etops - ETOPS capable aircraft, presumably implies twin-engined
  • experimental - For X1 and similar X-planes
  • fictional
  • fixed-gear
  • floats
  • glass-cockpit
  • low-wing
  • mid-wing
  • high-wing
  • h-tail
  • hud
  • ifr - Panel and equipment (radios, lighting) suitable for IFR flight
  • lifting-body
  • pressurised - Pressurised cabin
  • prototype
  • refuel - Supports air-to-air refeuling
  • retractable-gear
  • seaplane - Flying boat or float plane
  • skis
  • stol - For short-takeoff
  • supersonic
  • supercharger
  • t-tail
  • tail-dragger
  • tricycle
  • tail-hook
  • triplane
  • twin-boom
  • v-tail
  • variable-geometry - For Tomcats and the like
  • vtol - For the Harrier, F-35, and the Osprey
  • wing-fold - usually for carrier aircraft
  • water-drop

FlightGear Features

  • combat - Support this various MP combat / bomb-able options
  • dual-controls - Supports copilot over MP
  • tow - Supports glider towing over MP
  • rembrandt - Supports Rembrandt, obviously

Propulsion

  • afterburner
  • diesel
  • electric - For power-assisted gliders, mostly.
  • jet
  • propeller
  • piston
  • radial - Radial piston engined
  • rocket
  • single-engine
  • supercharged
  • turboprop - For pistons with a turbo-charger
  • twin-engine
  • four-engine
  • variable-pitch
  • fixed-pitch

Examples

  • B-52 would have: bomber, jet, boeing, coldwar, 1960s, vietnam, 1970s, 1980s, gulfwar1, nato, refuel, retractable-gear and ifr.
  • Citation would have: cessna, bizjet, jet, 2-engine, glass-cockpit, ifr and retractable-gear.
  • Cub would have: piper, piston, 1-engine, ga, trainer, fixed-gear, 1930s, ww2 and tail-dragger.

Adding metadata to aircraft

The tags are added to or included into the <sim> section of the Aircraft-set.xml file(s), like for example below:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<PropertyList>

 <!-- ... -->

 <sim>

  <!-- ... -->

  <tags>
   <tag>passenger</tag>
   <tag>boeing</tag>
   <tag>jet</tag>
   <tag>twin-engine</tag>
   <tag>retractable-gear</tag>
   <tag>etops</tag>
   <tag>glass-cockpit</tag>
   <tag>ifr</tag>
  </tags>

  <!-- ... -->

 </sim>

 <!-- ... -->

</PropertyList>

References

Related content

Wiki articles

Forum topics

Developer mailing list threads

Source code